123 - Big Bang Blueprints

Virtual Chaos

A Work In Progress
Copyright 1995-97 VirtualChaos.Org.
All Rights Reserved. Void where Prohibited.

The standard model, is the name of the current best understanding of physics that we possess. There are a number of holes in this theory, in fact it is made up of a bunch of different theories all strung together. Where they disagree with each other, we have a problem. Solving those problems and leaving only a single theory built from the various parts is the current goal of physics. The big bang is a good place to start to get a feel for the intuitive model virtual chaos presents. It points out a number of problems in the standard model, offers possible solutions, and also serves as a model for the Zen, the single particle of virtual chaos.

We begin with nothing, literally. Then bang the universe begins to fly apart in all directions. It is very hot and dense, and everything in it is melted in a plasma. As "TIME" progresses the volume of the universe grows until it is cold enough for a number of phase transitions to take place. These transitions allow the plasma to be differentiated into the various particles and the forces which act on them. Already we have problems with the standard model. The first is inflation.

The characteristics of space-time suggest that the very early universe underwent what is called an inflationary period. During this time the size of the universe increased by many orders of magnitude in a very short amount of time. Then it slowed down and has been expanding at its current rate ever since. This brings us to the second problem, the standard model cannot tell if the universe is open or closed. If it is open, it will keep on expanding forever, otherwise the gravity of all the stuff in it will pull it all back in and the whole universe will collapse in a final big crunch. After all these billions of years, it is still too close to call. From all appearances, the universe looks flat. That is why it is so hard to tell. This brings us to the third problem, there only appears to be about one tenth as much matter as would be needed to make the universe flat. Where is all the rest? This is called the missing mass problem.

Virtual chaos might account for all three of these problems, as well as a bunch of others, with the very simple and straight forward idea that the universe is expanding and collapsing at the same time. If the universe began as a point and collapsed instead of exploding, everything would look identical to how it does now. The difference would be that the edge of the universe would remain fixed while space-time and everything in it would be falling into a singularity at the center. If both of these events took place simultaneously, the universe would have zero net energy and be allowed as a vacuum fluctuation.

Virtual chaos also begins with nothing. Then the universe begins as a vacuum fluctuation. This fluctuation is both an inward and an outward expression and defines the continuum of space-time that is used. A three dimensional space is defined as a reference point, and the universe both explodes and collapses from that point. This creates an inflationary universe by default because as the center collapses, it reduces the size of any unit of measure one might use. This is the way that virtual chaos looks at time, it is the measuring of an ever increasing space with a continuously shrinking yardstick. This would also create a universe that is exactly flat, neither open or closed.

This view of the big bang has so far given us three aspects to consider. The imploding center- the Yin, the exploding shell- the Yang, and the initial scale it began at- Marks Radius. These three aspects define the field of space-time. Distortions in this field would then give rise to the different expressions of matter and energy. Matter would be seen as a distortion of time, and energy would be seen as a distortion of space. Both of these would also be expected to cancel in keeping with our zero net energy vacuum fluctuation model. How matter and energy behave depends on the direction they are moving within the continuum. Matter in our region of space-time moves into the future while energy dissipates into the past. This works for everything except gravity, but it is not exactly an exception.

Gravity is regarded by virtual chaos to be the inverse of the other three forces of nature combined. It is seen as a distortion of space which propagates in the direction of the future, while the other forces are seen as distortions of space that propagate into the past as expressions of angular momentum in one, two, or three dimensions. Likewise matter is seen as a distortion in time that propagates in the direction of the future, and anti-matter is seen as a distortion of time which propagates into the past.

Gravity is the first of the phase transitions to take place. In virtual chaos this is seen as the effect of the universe being pulled in two directions at the once, in and out, at 1e-43 seconds past time zero. 1e-43 seconds is equal to: 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 seconds. While the primordial plasma was being pushed outward,- a grand unified energy, it was balanced by a tendency to want to move inward,- gravity and its arrow of time. Vacuum fluctuations within this plasma might then have created the seeds from which the galaxies formed. [Another major conundrum].

Since the big bang of virtual chaos is itself seen as a vacuum fluctuation, everything must balance. This goes for angular momentum as well. While the Yang expanded rotating in one direction, the Yin would have collapsed rotating in the other. This creates a situation where the Yang is continually slowing down, and the Yin is always speeding up, the same way a figure skater in a spin speeds up by pulling her arms in tighter. This would have allowed the Yin to complete more than one rotation in the time it took the Yang to rotate just once. How much more? One order of magnitude on the binary scale. 2:1.

This first rotation [R1] produces an asymmetry in the fabric of space-time. At the end of R1 we have a 1:1 balance in the order of magnitude that the Yin and Yang have moved from Marks radius, however we have a 2:1 ratio with regard to the number of complete rotations each part went through. This 2:1 ratio defines the two parts of the whole, and this is what I mean when I say that "one plus two equals three" is the blueprint of creation. 123.

This brings us to spin. There are three main classes of spin used in the standard model, spin 1/2, spin one and spin two. The spin one particles transmit energy, the spin 1/2 particles are pieces of matter, and spin two is the graviton. The interesting thing about these spins is that they are not what one would imagine. The spin two for example, is not two spins but it's inverse, half a spin. And the same thing for the spin 1/2. It's not half a spin, it's two. This means that if you rotate a spin 1/2 particle 360 degrees, you don't end up back where you started, to do that you have to do it twice. Let's look at it again from the other angle.

We start with the spin one photon. This is indeed one full rotation, and defines the speed of light in a vacuum. This is also the shape of the space-time continuum at rest in virtual chaos, so it takes zero effort to remain here. It is the inverse of the passage of time, all space motion, zero time motion. The mass particles rotate this again, bringing space itself to the speed of light, c^2. The pull in the other direction would then manifest as only half a rotation, and this would then be seen as gravity. A 2:1 ratio of a 2:1 ratio.

This fits very well with the stuff that immediately preceded it, and the stuff before that. The matter particles, which move in the direction of the future, consist of two complete rotations just like the portion of space-time they move towards. Likewise, the energy particles are spin one, just like the Yang portion of R1, and dissipate into the past. So what about gravity then? Being spin two the graviton is in a class by itself. It distorts both time and space in the presence of matter and energy. The reason for this would appear to be that the phase transition that created it happened before R1, at 1e-43 seconds past time zero. The point that virtual chaos places the big bang at. Because virtual chaos starts time in the middle, at 1e-43 seconds past time zero, it is nonsensical to ask what happened before that time. Nothing existed before that. This allows both quantum mechanics and relativity to be correct, and provides the mechanism that allows the universe to be spontaneously created out of nothing.

Virtual chaos' model of creation as a vacuum fluctuation, and the asymmetry that R1 produced, combine to create a blueprint for the particles and their properties as outlined by the standard model. The four dimensional present that we experience, creates a sub/super-symmetry in the particles and forces which I will attempt to outline next.

The Interference Pattern:

Starting with four dimensions, [simply because it fits], we overlay our 2:1 ratio twice, once in each direction. This is done for aesthetic reasons, we want our symmetry to balance itself. The asymmetry of R1 must be somehow be balanced by an anti-asymmetry, as it were. So in virtual chaos, the three dimensions smaller than our four dimensional starting point, are balanced by six dimensions larger than it, 2:1. In this way, the forth dimension serves as ground zero for a 2:1 expression of space. So what about time? The passage of time is measured by the speed of light, period. Distort space and the speed of light will compensate for it automatically. This will speed up the passage of time in areas that are free of distortion, and slow it down in the regions of space that are more heavily distorted. The vehicle of light is the photon, and this marks another ground zero in our description.

Two dimensions would appear to be ground zero with regard to the particles and forces of the standard model. Relativity tells us that as an object approaches the speed of light, it contracts along its axis of motion. In other words, it gets shorter in the direction that it is moving. If an object were to reach the speed of light, it would then be perfectly flat! Infinitely massive, but perfectly flat. Virtual chaos then poses the question; what if it started out on it's trajectory perfectly flat? Would it then bypass the accumulation of energy that relativity would create by accelerating it? Observation of photons would suggest that the answer is yes, but then one would have to describe the photon as a two dimensional, perfectly flat object. So that's what virtual chaos did.

Viewed in four dimensions, the photon would then be expected to carry the electromagnetic charge, two forces which act at right angles to each other, [an Electro magnetic dipole]. Being flat however, it would be expected to move at the speed of light. This means that time for it would stop completely, and it would not have time to decay. This would make it a stable, long-range particle. The fact that it is massless instead of infinitely massive, is puzzling. It would suggest that shearing an object at 90 degrees to its trajectory could produce energy from matter. Well, it's not really that odd anymore, but the 90 degree part is still pretty weird. Fact is, curving the trajectory of a charged particle 90 degrees, does produce photons [radiation - pretty cool stuff too]. It takes a lot of energy, but that's just because they are doing it Electro-mechanically, at right angles to it's path. If two beams of particles, were repulsed by each other at the distances at hand, now that's another question entirely. Conversely, they might also exhibit the same behavior if the were attracted, but passed each other on the opposite side, of their center of gravity. [ Very small, and exceedingly fast].

Interestingly enough, there just happens to be a particle and it's anti-particle that will collide and create photons, ANY. Anti-matter is defined by it's opposite charge alone, [ the kaon is the known exception]. In virtual chaos, this is seen as defining whether an object is moving forward or backward through the space-time continuum, relative to our position. Past and future would both be seen to posses an electric charge, relative to our electrically neutral present, the combination of the two. This is the interference pattern of the opposing two thirds. [Star of David pattern]

If the electron and the photon were the same particle moving 90 degrees to itself, it might explain a bunch of stuff. For example, the photo-electric effect would be expected, and Cooper pairs, [superconductivity], would make the object superconductive either way through time. A four dimensional present would allow this photo-electric force to ricochet off itself, at right angles, effortlessly. In virtual chaos, it is this effortless transition between matter and energy, that defines the speed of light.

Thus quantum jumps are indeed instantaneous, in that no elapsed time is manifest, whatsoever. [Space itself collapses, sucked up by angular momentum]. [I.e. the Yin collapses farther, creating space just inside marks radius, whose angular momentum is then added to the value of the Yin, as if nothing had changed except the energy level]. A relative quantum event.

This second ground zero, is the result of the second rotation of the Yin during R1. It also allows space-time to slide off itself at right angles, just like the four dimensional space-time shear. This creates an axis around which the one dimensional, and three dimensional forces and particles offset each other. A sub symmetry set within the larger symmetry. Same shape, only smaller. So even though this "Area" occupied only one third of the space, it defined two thirds of the shear potential, whatever that actually is. It also pairs the forces and particles in a four dimensional context, around a two dimensional base value, the speed of light. Such a pairing might then be expected to produce a three way composite, massive particle [2:1 in nature], paired with a single charge particle, both of which would be stable. The charge that unified them might then be the photon, moving at the speed of light, and defining the space between them.

This brings us to the Neutron. It is the measure of all things nuclear, ground zero as it were, with regard to matter. It is another good example of the 123 blueprint virtual chaos uses to define the particles. It is one particle, made from two leptons and three quarks. [Actually that describes the proton, plus an electron, plus an anti-neutrino, but they add up to a neutron] The quarks are two down and an up,[2:1], and are the inverse of the proton which is two up and a down. [Two smalls and a large, like space-time itself]. Because it forms the star of David pattern mentioned before, that of a 2:1 and a 1:2 interference, its symmetry is balanced with regard to both the continuum and electric charge. Let's take it apart now.

If we just sit here and wait a moment, actually about 1000 seconds or so, the neutron will come apart by itself. This is called decay and it happens to everything with four exceptions; the proton, the electron, the neutrino, and the photon. It just so happens that these are the very same things that come flying out of the neutron when it decays, [usually]. The difference in the makeup between the neutron we started with, and the proton that remains, is that one of its down quarks has changed into an up quark. That change shows the link between the quarks and leptons. Virtual chaos relates the quarks to the leptons by viewing the leptons as the inverse of partial quarks.

Virtual chaos adds a distinction between the different kinds of leptons which is not used by the standard model, in addition to elevating them from point particle status. It divides them by charge, or lack thereof, and defines them as one or two dimensional. The neutrinos are seen as being one dimensional and the charged leptons, [the electron, muon, and tau], are seen as two dimensional. This distinction reproduces the symmetry and asymmetry of R1. The quark / lepton ratio is 1:1, so is the ratio between charged and uncharged leptons. The number of dimensions that they exist in however, creates a 2:1 ratio between the quarks and leptons, as well as a 2:1 ratio between the dimensions occupied by the charged and uncharged leptons. Again a 2:1 ratio of a 2:1 ratio.

The single charge carried by the electron is seen to be a manifestation of angular momentum in two dimensions, an electromagnetic dipole. The one dimensional neutrinos would thus be incapable of carrying it and would be neutral. By the same token, the three dimensional quarks would have an extra dimension, so would carry this charge in two out of the three, [2:1], dimensions where it would be exhibited as a 2/3 charge, or conversely as a 1/3 negative charge. The nice thing about this very simple symmetry is that it would give rise to the three way baryons as the basic particle configuration by default.

The symmetry and asymmetry of R1 is also seen in the way that the force carrying particles arrange themselves as well. [Note: the graviton is not included in this symmetry.] There are twelve spin 1/2 matter particles, 6 quarks and 6 leptons, which are acted upon by twelve spin 1 force particles, 1:1. These force particles however, break down into eight color gluons, and four electro-weak carriers, 2:1. Furthermore, the one dimensional nature virtual chaos ascribes to the color force, can be used to predict the way the color gluons would arrange themselves; six color / anti-color pairs, and two three way color / anti-color composites.

Can R1 be used to predict the particle masses? Sort of. While this simple symmetry works very well for explaining the arrangement of the particles into the groups that they naturally seem to create, the characteristics of mass complicate things considerably. The reason for this is that the effects of relativity on quantum phenomena, make any description of it very challenging, to say the least. Because of this I will not go into the technical math, but instead explain what it does.

Starting with our vacuum fluctuation model again, two particles are created out of nothing. One of them is red shifted in one direction, while it's partner is blue shifted in the other, [with regard to a stationary background space-time]. The effect that this has on them would cause the blue shifted partner to become smaller and less massive, while the red shifted partner became larger and more massive, relative to the initial value they were both shifting away from. The values they would assume would rise very steeply at first and then taper off in one direction, and fall the same way in the other. Two exponential curves moving opposite directions from an initial starting point. This is the same pattern that space-time itself displayed during R1 to produce the initial inflation, which then tapered off to expand at the current speed.

We should then expect to find a 2:1 ratio across three orders of magnitude, [one smaller, one larger, and the starting one], between the masses of the positive and negatively charged particles. 2000:1. While this is close to the mass difference between the proton and the electron, it is not exactly the difference. The reason for the discrepancy is expected to be found in the effects that relativity has on the process, and in the fact that this effect would be expected to be counter to the first, symmetrically opposed but on a different scale. This would raise the mass of the smaller charged particle slightly by slowing the first relative effect, and inversely lower the mass of the larger charged particle for the same reason. Even when we take all that into account, it is still not expected to fit exactly. The fractal nature of the Zen would mean that this adjustment would have to be repeated again, in the other direction, on yet a smaller scale, back and forth, ad infinitum.

Black Holes

The 123 pattern of R1 also has a number of effects concerning black holes. In "10D Torque", black holes were defined as angular momentum at speeds which surpassed the speed of light. The result of this is that their event horizons would "scoop up" photons from the side, a very difficult task considering we just said that the photons were two dimensional and move at the speed of light. So what are these black holes, and just how do they work?

According to the standard model, black holes are concentrations of mass so high, that even light itself cannot escape its gravity. They possess a singularity, an event horizon, and a line of sight. The event horizon, is the point of no return. Even light cannot escape. So anything that crosses this boundary is doomed forever to be added to the mass of the black hole. Very often there is an accretion disk surrounding the equator of a black hole. All of this material will eventually fall into this bottomless pit, after relativity nearly stops its passage of time, and the black hole's gravity accelerates it to fantastic speeds.

The singularity of the black hole is a mathematical point. So the question is, what exists between the event horizon and the singularity of the black hole? [The Vortex and the Sphere] Well, we have two choices, nothing, or some kind of mystery goop. Let's start with nothing. If nothing exists between the singularity and the event horizon then it would be completely devoid of space-time itself, because if the continuum extended into the black hole past the event horizon, the energy there would "boil" it into a quark / lepton plasma. We're back to the mystery goop.

Virtual chaos looks at it both ways again, [its a floorwax AND a dessert topping]. We either have a mass the diameter of the event horizon comprised of naked quarks running free, our mystery goop, or space-time stops at the event horizon. If we take the view that space-time stops at the event horizon, we have found a region of the cosmos where we can witness a distinguishable "edge" of the space-time continuum. That's not very appealing, possible, just not real pretty. Combining the two views with R1, something very different emerges, a temporal distortion which occupies negative space.

When a black hole forms, it does so because the mass of the object was higher than could be supported by a neutron star. Everything is then crushed out of existence, or is it? Something must still be there to exhibit that much gravitational power, but it doesn't occupy any space. A massive disturbance of time alone? But time has stopped. And began pooling. The forces acting on the continuum would have reached the point where the strength of the neutron would no longer be sufficient to hold up the mass against its own weight. The space-time continuum would then bend the other way, so to speak. It would be turned inside out by this expression of mass. From this point on, any added force would produce an inverted version of R1.

The singularity and the event horizon would be the same at the neutron pressures. But from there, any more pressure and the event horizon begins to act like Marks radius. Pushing inward to define the radius of the black hole, and pushing outward with an expression of negative space. The same 2:1 ratio is used as before, two parts black hole, one part negative space. This negative space extends from the event horizon, the point where light is trapped traveling straight up from the black hole, to the line of sight, the point where light would be trapped in orbit around the black hole, 90 degrees of rotation.

An interesting phenomenon takes place at the line of sight, angular momentum reverses direction. Because of this, it would be very difficult to actually tell which direction was up, and away from the black hole's event horizon. This is the line where the continuum would be turned inside out from. Its distance is usually written as 3/2 times the radius of the black hole, but you can also look at it from the other way and say that the event horizon is 2/3 the distance from the singularity to the line of sight, 2:1. The reason this phenomenon should occur at that distance has, as yet, no explanation in the standard model.

This also illustrates the difference between the quarks and leptons in virtual chaos. The quarks bend the continuum one way, while the leptons would bend it the other. Each would wrap the continuum around it and seal it off, [c^2], but one would do so in positive space while the other did so in negative space. 2:1. The group that did this in positive space, the 1/3, would then appear to have done this again within that positive space, only this time spitting 2:1 dimensionally. This would create the split between the electro-magnetic and the weak forces, while the first split would have defined the strong force. Both of these splits would have occurred after the initial 2:1 split that defined the space-time continuum, and gave rise to the force of gravity. R1.

[Home] [Virtual Science] [Virtual Phenomena] [Virtual Humanities] [Links] [Email]